Volume 12, Number 3, October 2006
Copyright © 2006 Society for Music Theory
“Who’s on First?”: Response to David H. Smyth’s review of Stravinsky’s Histoire du soldat: A Facsimile of the Sketches, edited by Maureen A. Carr (Middleton, Wisconsin: A-R Editions, 2005)
 David H. Smyth’s review of my Facsimile Edition of the Sketches for Stravinsky’s Histoire du soldat is written in such a way that it is often difficult for the reader to determine what Carr said and what Smyth said about the identification and description of specific sketch pages pertaining to Histoire—hence the title “Who’s on First?”(1)
 Many of the points raised by Smyth could benefit from further discussion, but I will save that for another occasion. In this brief response I wish to express some clear and distinct ideas that should clarify and correct some of the larger issues having to do with Smyth’s review: the Chester edition of 1987, the fragment in Ramuz’s hand at the Stravinsky Archive of the Paul Sacher Stiftung, the manuscript of the Conductor’s Score at the Rychenberg Stiftung of the Stadtbibliothek Winterthur, the nature of the copyist’s score that is lost in the publisher’s warehouse, the Croquis, the ordering of sketches within certain Groups, the Winterthur Sketchbook, and the incipit for Fig. 3.7 that is likely to be the earliest sketch for the Grand Choral:(2)
 Until the copyist’s manuscript surfaces with annotations by Stravinsky and others, many questions will remain unanswered. In the meantime, at least one page of the copyist’s score is reprinted on page ii of the 1987 edition, published by Chester Music (CH 55726).
Stravinsky, Igor. 1987. Histoire du soldat, ed. John Carewe, Percussion part transcribed and edited by James Blades. Chester Music. CH 55726.
1. Here I am not referring to points in the Commentary that were cited by Smyth but to the identification and description of specific sketch pages pertaining to
Histoire that were not always clearly referenced by Smyth as to what Carr said. For example, please see Smyth’s [par. 14] discussion of Group 8 and compare it to Carr [Table One: (p. 88)—comparison between Fig. 8.1 and Fig. 5.7 and repeated in Table Two (p. 327)]
Here I am not referring to points in the Commentary that were cited by Smyth but to the identification and description of specific sketch pages pertaining to Histoire that were not always clearly referenced by Smyth as to what Carr said. For example, please see Smyth’s [par. 14] discussion of Group 8 and compare it to Carr [Table One: (p. 88)—comparison between Fig. 8.1 and Fig. 5.7 and repeated in Table Two (p. 327)]
Bracketed numbers refer to the paragraph numbers in Smyth’s review.
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for Music Theory. All rights reserved.
 Copyrights for individual items published in Music Theory Online (MTO) are held by their authors. Items appearing in MTO may be saved and stored in electronic or paper form, and may be shared among individuals for purposes of scholarly research or discussion, but may not be republished in any form, electronic or print, without prior, written permission from the author(s), and advance notification of the editors of MTO.
 Any redistributed form of items published in MTO must include the following information in a form appropriate to the medium in which the items are to appear:
 Libraries may archive issues of MTO in electronic or paper form for public access so long as each issue is stored in its entirety, and no access fee is charged. Exceptions to these requirements must be approved in writing by the editors of MTO, who will act in accordance with the decisions of the Society for Music Theory.
This document and all portions thereof are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Material contained herein may be copied and/or distributed for research purposes only.